top of page

Exploration of Current Research in Automated Reasoning and Logical Programming

Updated: Jul 31, 2023

Introduction

Automated reasoning and logical programming represent crucial areas of study within the realm of artificial intelligence (AI), concentrating on applying formal logic to automate problem-solving and rational thinking. Automated reasoning systems autonomously create proofs for mathematical theorems, while logical programming languages facilitate the development of programs as a series of logical rules. Significant strides have been made in both fields, with new methods and tools enhancing their practicality and efficiency. This article delves into contemporary research and developments in automated reasoning and logical programming, highlighting their potential applications and challenges through specific examples, anecdotal accounts, and recent references.


First-order logic (FOL) and higher-order logic (HOL) are foundational formalisms in the realm of automated reasoning and logical programming. FOL, or predicate logic, allows for quantification over objects but not predicates or functions. HOL, on the other hand, extends FOL by allowing quantification over higher-order entities, such as predicates and functions. This results in more expressive and succinct representations of intricate mathematical concepts.

A recent trend in automated reasoning research involves the development of effective algorithms and tools capable of handling both FOL and HOL. For example, the Vampire theorem prover (Kovács and Voronkov, 2013) is a cutting-edge FOL automated reasoning system that has achieved considerable success in various theorem proving competitions, like the CASC competition. Similarly, the Leo-III theorem prover (Steen and Benzmueller, 2018) is an outstanding HOL prover, displaying impressive performance in the HOL category of the CASC competition.


Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) is a vital area of study in automated reasoning, focusing on establishing the satisfiability of logical formulas concerning specific background theories. SMT combines propositional satisfiability (SAT) solvers with theory-specific decision procedures to efficiently solve intricate problems that involve reasoning across multiple theories, such as arithmetic, arrays, or bit-vectors.

A notable trend in SMT research is the development of powerful and versatile SMT solvers, like Z3 (de Moura and Bjørner, 2008), which have been widely utilized in various fields, including software verification, constraint solving, and symbolic execution. The Z3 solver has experienced continuous improvements and has become an essential tool for researchers and practitioners alike.

Merging Automated Reasoning and Logical Programming in AI Systems


The integration of automated reasoning and logical programming in AI systems has become increasingly important, enabling these systems to benefit from the expressive power of logic and automated reasoning capabilities. One such example is the fusion of logical programming with machine learning, leading to the emergence of a new research area called Statistical Relational Learning (SRL).

SRL merges the strengths of logical programming, such as expressivity and interpretability, with the power of statistical learning techniques to manage uncertainty and learn from data. Probabilistic logical programming languages like ProbLog (De Raedt et al., 2007) and Markov Logic Networks (MLNs) (Richardson and Domingos, 2006) are representative examples of SRL frameworks that have been successfully applied to various AI tasks, including knowledge graph completion, natural language understanding, and drug discovery.


Interactive theorem proving (ITP) is a technique that combines the capabilities of automated theorem provers with human expertise to develop formal proofs of complex mathematical theorems and verify software systems. In ITP, human users guide the proof process by providing high-level proof steps, while the system automates low-level reasoning tasks.

Recent trends in ITP research include the development of powerful proof assistants, such as Coq (Bertot and Castéran, 2004), Isabelle/HOL (Nipkow et al., 2002), and Lean (de Moura et al., 2015), which have been employed in various groundbreaking projects. For example, the formal proof of the Kepler Conjecture (Hales et al., 2017) and the verification of the seL4 microkernel (Klein et al., 2009) were both achieved using ITP systems, demonstrating their potential in advancing mathematics and ensuring the correctness of critical software systems.

Addressing Scalability and Efficiency in Automated Reasoning and Logical Programming


Scalability and efficiency continue to be critical challenges in automated reasoning and logical programming research. As the complexity of problems and the size of knowledge bases increase, it becomes crucial to develop techniques that can efficiently handle large-scale reasoning tasks.

One approach to address this issue is the development of parallel and distributed automated reasoning and logical programming systems. For example, parallel SAT solvers like ManySAT (Hamadi et al., 2009) and portfolio-based SMT solvers like SMTInterpol have demonstrated significant improvements in solving time by leveraging the power of multi-core processors and distributed computing environments.

References: Kovács, L., and Voronkov, A. (2013). First-Order Theorem Proving and Vampire. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-39799-8_1

Steen, A., and Benzmueller, C. (2018). The Higher-Order Prover Leo-III. https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.00668

de Moura, L., and Bjørner, N. (2008). Z3: An Efficient SMT Solver. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-78800-3_24


De Raedt, L., et al. (2007). ProbLog: A Probabilistic Prolog and Its Application in Link Discovery. https://www.ijcai.org/Proceedings/07/Papers/240.pdf

Nipkow, T., et al. (2002). Isabelle/HOL: A Proof Assistant for Higher-Order Logic. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/3-540-45949-9

Reference: de Moura, L., et al. (2015). The Lean Theorem Prover (system description). https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.02044


Hamadi, Y., et al. (2009). ManySAT: A Parallel SAT Solver. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-02777-2_9

4 views0 comments

Opmerkingen


bottom of page